Envy to the penis - the basic postulate of the Freudian psychoanalysis - is doubtful among many women. But how many men are ready to dispute it? One of the first was the original Russian philosopher of the twentieth century Ivan Solovyov. Excerpt.
“One of my friends once admitted that she received a visual idea of the structure of the female body only carefully looking at her newborn daughter. I was amazed: after all, a married woman, - and only then felt the whole abyss that separates us from women. For us, this is from childhood - a toy, then a gun, and always in sight, noticeable and achievable. It is outside, and in women it is inside: such a secret that they themselves have no clear access to it. They don’t know ourselves, but we know ourselves: this difference of being out of itself and returned to itself and is laid down in the division of the sexes.
Alberto Moravio has the novel “I and He”, consisting of a man’s constant dialogue with his member: a person reproaches him, abrasions, and the object rebels and involves adventures. The bottom line is that my cock is indeed my smaller brother, my second “I”, a naughty double, possessing as pronounced being as my whole body. This means that I am originally bifurcated, I am extra for myself, I am always at hand, I get and catch myself on the “verb of being”, on a “creative word”.
My member is my smaller brother, the second “I”, a naughty double, possessing as pronounced being as my whole body.
And in the relationship of adult sexes. Men invented women's envy of their civil rights, while much more than this wrinkled, legal use of the concrete miracle of conception, when a whole unprecedented world is excited from the daily use of a legal use. Whether to exchange this unknown world in man for human rights in the famous world?
It seems to me that deep people are always a little woman. And if they have some kind of envy, then it is to gaping and absence. ". 1
1 Reflections of Ivan Solovyov about Eros were written in the mid-1960s, and published much later in the journal "Man, 1991, No. 1).
Afterword Mikhail Epstein
Mikhail Epstein is a philosopher, a culturalist, professor of the University of Emory (USA), author of numerous articles, essays, Internet projects and books, including a “. On the future of the humanities "(UFO, 2004).
"The author’s position can be defined as feminine feminism"
"Ivan Igorevich Soloviev (1944-1990?) taught Russian language and literature in one of the Moscow schools, but his interests extended to a variety of areas of world culture and had almost encyclopedic. His sketches for a huge essay, which the author himself considered the main and “final” has been http://oralhistorygroups.gr/news/the_modern_era__cialis_and_revolutionary_change.html preserved. This is its kind of encyclopedia of mental search and error of mankind. One of the sections of the book was supposedly called “eroticon, or the view of all desires”, from where the fragment above was taken. At the same time, the author does not resort to science -like terminology, but relies on personal experience and sensations, probably familiar to many readers. The essay is remarkable in that the concept of “envy of the vagina” introduces as an answer to the Freudian “envy of the penis” much earlier than this happened in scientific and therapeutic psychoanalysis. For example, the book Harold Tarpley "Vagina Envy in Men" was released only in 1993. Moreover, Ivan Soloviev, challenging Freudian male chauvinism, does not join the standard M-phuminism (masculine feminism), which, affirming the social equality of sexes, ignores their deep biological and metaphysical difference. The position of the author, rarely rare, can be defined as F-phuminism-feminine feminism, which justifies the superiority of the female in his own physiological and spiritual sphere."